*Before you watch this video you should check out the previous video in the Biostats & Epidemiology section which covers the related topics of Probability, Odds, RR & OR. That video lays the foundation for this video so it may be difficult to start with this one.*

# Attributable risk & Absolute Risk Reduction

Attributable Risk (AR) and Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) are how much of the observed change in risk is due to the treatment (or exposure) being studied. Put another way AR is the amount of disease that would be eliminated if the exposure was eliminated. ARR would be the amount of disease that would be eliminated if all patients were receiving the drug. ARR and AR are essential the same thing but used in different situations. They are both calculated the same way. The only difference is that in AR the probability of disease is going down due to a treatment and in ARR the probability is going up due to an exposure or risk factor.

I’m never able to keep the two formulas straight and the difference isn’t that important so I don’t even try. I just remember it like this:

# Number Needed to Treat & Number Needed to Harm

Both Number Needed to Treat and Number Needed to Harm are 1 divided by the absolute risk reduction or attributable risk (whichever is more appropriate). The Number Needed to Treat is how many people you need to give a particular treatment to in order to have a positive effect on one person. Number Needed to Harm is the number of people that need to be exposed to a risk factor to effect one person.

*Now that you have finished this video you should check out the next video in the Biostatistics & Epidemiology section which covers the Null Hypothesis, Alternative Hypothesis & Types of Error.*

?????// but thank you anyway.

Melvin Hernandez, DMD

Was there something in particular that I didn’t explain well?

hey i think you mixed the two up in your last statement of the first paragraph, The one that starts as “The only difference is…..” i think you interchanged the AR and the ARR